Narmada Valley Project Case Study

Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) is a social movement consisting of adivasis, farmers, environmentalists and human rightsactivists against the number of large dams being built across the Narmada River, which flows through the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat is one of the biggest dams on the river and was one of the first focal points of the movement. It is one of the many dams under the Narmada Dam Project. The main aim of the project is to provide irrigation and electricity to people in these states.

Their mode of campaign includes court actions, hunger strikes, rallies, and gathering support from notable film and art personalities. Narmada Bachao Andolan, with its leading spokespersons Medha Patkar and Baba Amte, have received the Right Livelihood Award in 1991.[1]

History[edit]

Right After independence, under the newly formed government headed by Jawaharlal Nehru .Investigations were carried out to evaluate mechanisms for using water from the Narmada River,[2] which flows into the Arabian Sea after passing through the states of Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat. The formation of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal was triggered by interstate differences in implementing schemes and sharing of water by the Government of India on 6 October 1969 to adjudicate over the disputes.[3] The tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and responded after more than 10 years. The Narmada Tribunal aimed to set out conditions regarding the resettlement and rehabilitation of those displaced by the dams.[4] On 12 December 1979, after ten years of investigation, the decision as given by the tribunal, with all the parties at dispute binding to it, was released by the Indian government.[3]

As per the tribunal's decision, 30 major, 135 medium, and 3000 small dams, were granted approval for construction, including raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar dam.[3] This decision was motivated by the assumption that it would provide water to around forty million people, irrigation, and electricity to people in the region.[5] Thus, the construction began.

In 1985, after hearing about the Sardar Sarovar dam, Medha Patkar and her colleagues visited the project site and noticed that project work being checked due to an order by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. The reasons for this was cited as "non-fulfillment of basic environmental conditions and the lack of completion of crucial studies and plans".[6] The people who were going to be affected by the construction of the dam were given no information but the offer for rehabilitation.[7] Villagers weren't consulted and weren't asked for a feedback on the assessment that had taken place. Furthermore, the officials related to the project had not even checked the land records and updated them.[7] While World Bank, the financing agency for this project, came into the picture, Patkar approached the Ministry of Environment to seek clarifications. She realized, after seeking answers from the ministry, that the project was not sanctioned at all and wondered as to how funds were even sanctioned by the World Bank. After several studies, they realized that the officials had overlooked the post project problems.[8]

Through Patkar's channel of communication between the government and the residents, she provided critiques to the project authorities and the governments involved. At the same time, her group realized that all those displaced were given compensation only for the immediate standing crop and not for displacement and rehabilitation.[9]

As Patkar remained immersed in the Narmada struggle, she chose to quit her Ph.D. studies and focus entirely on the Narmada activity.[10] Thereafter, she organized a 36-day solidarity march among the neighboring states of the Narmada valley from Madhya Pradesh to the Sardar Sarovar dam site.[11] She said that the march was "a path symbolizing the long path of struggle (both immediate and long-term) that [they] really had".[12] The march was resisted by the police, who according to Patkar were "caning the marchers and arresting them and tearing the clothes off women activists".[12]

Within the focus of the NBA towards the stoppage of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, Patkar advised adding the World Bank to its propaganda.[10] Using the right to fasting, she undertook a 22-day fast that almost took her life.[13] Patkar's actions did force the World Bank to set up The Morse Commission, an independent review of the project.[14] Their report clearly stated that the Bank's policies on environment and resettlement were being violated by the project.[15] The World Bank's participation in these projects was canceled in 1993.[16] Before the World Bank could pull out, the Indian Government did.[14]

She undertook a similar fast in 1993 and resisted evacuation from the dam site.[13] In 1994, the Narmada Bachao Andolan office was attacked reportedly by a couple of political parties, and Patkar and other activists were physically assaulted and verbally abused.[17] In protest, a few NBA activists and she began a fast; 20 days later, they were arrested and forcibly fed intravenously.[17]

The Sardar Sarovar Dam's construction began again in 1999 after the construction was allowed and was declared finished in 2006. It was inaugurated in 2017 by Prime Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi, who barely gave a second thought as to what the problem were that the adivasis would face.. After construction in 2017, the height has been increased from 138 meters to 163 meters.[citation needed]

Formation[edit]

There were many groups such as Gujarat-based Narmada Asargrastha Samiti Madhya Pradesh-based Narmada Ghati Nav Nirman Samiti (Committee for a New Life in the Narmada Valley) and Maharashtra-Based Narmada Dharangrastha Samiti (Committee for Narmada Dam-Affected People) who either believed in the need for fair rehabilitation plans for the people or who vehemently opposed dam construction despite a resettlement policy.[18]

Narmada Bachao Andolan was also joined by several NGOs with local people, professionals, and activists as the founders with a non-violent approach.[18] It was led by Medha Patkar. Nationally, they wanted an alternative structure of development and internationally, they wanted to build pressure on the World Bank to take accountability.[19]

NBA's slogans include - Vikas Chahiye, Vinash Nahin! (Development wanted, not destruction) and "koi nahi hatega, bandh nahi banega!" (we won't move, the dam won't be constructed).[20]

Role of the World Bank[edit]

The World Bank began working on the Narmada Project after it got clearance from the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal.[21] The bank sent a team for the assessment of the project in economic and technical terms.[21] This team didn't focus on the social or environmental issues.[22] What Jawaharlal Nehru thought of as temples of the independent India, i.e. the dams, have already displaced 11 million Indians.[22]

However, the Bank realised the harm that it had done by sanctioning the loan for the project and thus announced that the new projects should "ensure that, after a reasonable transition period, the displaced people regain at least their previous standard of living."[23] Despite this, the relocation process was flawed. Several tribal people have been harmed by the project. The Bank then adopted certain policies to ensure proper relocation of the tribal people and protect them from the forced relocation .[16] The Indian government, however, did not adopt these policies.[24]

In 1985, irrespective of the harm done by the Sardar Sarovar project, the World bank sanctioned a loan to the state governments for construction purposes.[25] The Bank did ask for a proper resettlement design but also said, "The argument in favour of the Sardar Sarovar Project is that the benefits are so large that they substantially outweigh the costs of the immediate human and environmental disruption."[16]

Medha Patkar and other protesters testified on the Bank's role in Washington D.C in 1989. This led to a build-up of pressure on the Bank to set an independent review to assess the situation at hand. A lot of support was withdrawn from the project after this.

The Morse Commission was established to look into the construction of the dam, and the environmental cost and human displacement in 1991.[26] For the first time, a Bank commissioned panel had complete access to the documents to form a report.[16] The 357 pages' report mentioned the lack of any environmental assessment undertaken either by the Indian Government or the World Bank.[16] In an internal referendum held, the Bank very closely voted for the continuation of the Narmada Dam Project.[16]

The Indian Government canceled the loan sanctioned by the World Bank on March 31, 1993.

People involved[edit]

Medha Patkar has been the guiding light of the movement. She has organized several fasts and satyagrahas. Patkar has also been to jail because of her desire to achieve right to life and livelihood for the suppressed people.

Another popular figure was Baba Amte, known for his work against leprosy. He published a booklet called Cry O Beloved Narmada in 1989 to protest against the construction of the dams.[27]

Amongst the major celebrities who have shown their support for Narmada Bachao Andolan are Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy[28] and Aamir Khan.[29] It was also supported by music composer and bass guitarist in the band Indian Ocean, Rahul Ram, who was actively involved in the movement from 1990 to 1995. [30]

In 1994 was the launch of Narmada: A Valley Rises, by filmmaker Ali Kazimi.[31] It documents the five-week Sangharsh Yatra of 1991. The film went on to win several awards and is considered by many to be a classic on the issue. In 1996, veteran documentary filmmaker, Anand Patwardhan, made an award-winning documentary: A Narmada Diary.[32]Alok Agarwal, current member of the Aam Aadmi Party, is an active figure in the movement.

Bihar CM Nitish Kumar participated in rally organised by NBA on the bank of Narmada at Rajghat on 16th Sep 2016. Expressing solidarity with the Andolan Mr. Nitish Kumar said "I have come from Patna to extend support to the agitation on the side of river Narmada here".[33]

Supporting the NBA's main demand CM Nitish Kumar appealed to PM Mr Modi at Rajghat saying "Pradhan Mantri ji, don't close the gates of Sardar Sarovar Dam. Rehabilitate people not by giving cash, but giving them alternative land/employment. Don't make plans to drown 2.5 lakh people by closing the gates," he said in a statement released in Barwani.[34]

Decision[edit]

The court ruled for Andolan, effecting an immediate stoppage of work at the dam and directing the concerned states to complete the rehabilitation and replacement process.[35]

It deliberated on this issue further for several years and finally upheld the Tribunal Award and allowed the construction to proceed, subject to conditions. The court introduced a mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari passu with the raising of the height of the dam through the Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each party state. The decision referred in this document, given in 2000 after 7 years of deliberations, has paved the way for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits. The court's final line of the order states, "Every endeavour shall be made to see that the project is completed as expeditiously as possible".[36]

Subsequent to the verdict, Press Information Bureau (PIB) featured an article:

"The Narmada Bachao Andolaan (NBA)has rendered a yeoman's service to the country by creating a high-level of awareness about the environmental and rehabilitation and relief aspects of Sardar Sarovar and other projects on the Narmada. But, after the court verdict it is incumbent on it to adopt a new role. Instead of 'damning the dam' any longer, it could assume the role of vigilant observer to see that the resettlement work is as humane and painless as possible and that the environmental aspects are taken due care of."[37]

Aftermath and Criticism[edit]

Medha Patkar continues to fight for proper rehabilitation of the displaced people in Madhya Pradesh as well as the reception of the promised compensation by the Narmada Tribunal.[38] This movement has brought forth the different notions of development. The Indian government has often argued that the cost of displacements are outweighed by the benefit derived from the Narmada Project, and thus, justified its construction. NBA, on the other hand has argued no matter how large the benefits, the cost to the society cannot be fulfilled.

Critics argue that dam's benefits include provision of drinking water, power generation and irrigation facilities. However, it is believed that the campaign, led by the NBA activists, has held up the project's completion, and NBA supporters have attacked on local people who accepted compensation for moving.[39] Others have argued that the Narmada Dam protesters are little more than environmental extremists, who use pseudoscientificagitprop to scuttle the development of the region and that the dam will provide agricultural benefits to millions of poor in India.[40][41] There had also been instances of the NBA activists turning violent and attacking rehabilitation officer from Narmada Valley Development Authority (NVDA), which caused damage to the contractor's machinery.[42]

The NBA has been accused of lying under oath in court about land ownership in areas affected by the dam.[43] The Supreme Court has mulled perjury charges against the group.[44]

References[edit]

  1. ^"Medha Patkar and Baba Amte / Narmada Bachao AndolanThe RightLivelihood Award". www.right livelihoodaward.org. Retrieved 2016-10-25. 
  2. ^"Relevant dates prior to the constitution of the tribunal". Narmada Control Authority. Retrieved 2008-02-10. [dead link]
  3. ^ abc"Relevant dates prior to the constitution of the tribunal". Narmada Valley Development Government of Madhya Pradesh. 
  4. ^Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York University School of Law. p. 7. 
  5. ^Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. Leiden Journal of International Law. p. 358. 
  6. ^Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. pp. 157–158. ISBN 1-56324-341-5. 
  7. ^ abFisher, William (1995). Towards Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M.E Sharpe. p. 159. ISBN 1-56324-341-5 – via Google Books. 
  8. ^Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. pp. 159–160. ISBN 1-56324-341-5. 
  9. ^Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 161. ISBN 1-56324-341-5. 
  10. ^ ab"Medha Patkar: Biography"(PDF). Women in World History. Retrieved 2008-02-10. 
  11. ^Mehta, Mona G. (2010-10-12). "A river of no dissent: Narmada Movement and coercive Gujarati nativism". South Asian History and Culture. 1 (4): 509–528. doi:10.1080/19472498.2010.507023. ISSN 1947-2498. 
  12. ^ abFisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 166. ISBN 1-56324-341-5. 
  13. ^ ab"Medha Patkar: Summary of Achievements". United Nations Environment Program. Retrieved 2008-02-09. 
  14. ^ abKathleen D. Yurchak, Armin Rosencranz (1996). Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India. 19 Hastings International and Company. p. 515. 
  15. ^Clark, Dana (2002). The World Bank and Human Rights: The Need for Greater Accountability. HARV. HUM. RTS. pp. 205, 217. 
  16. ^ abcdefCaufield, Catherine (1996). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. pp. Ch–1. 
  17. ^ abRowell, Andrew (1996). Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environmental Movement. Routledge. p. 285. ISBN 0-415-12827-7. 
  18. ^ abFisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 23. ISBN 1-56324-341-5. 
  19. ^Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. p. 5.
  20. ^Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2005). The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. 18 Leiden Journal of International Law. pp. 365– 366
  21. ^ abCaufield, Catherine (1996). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. p. 11.
  22. ^ abCaufield, Catherine (1997). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. p. 12.
  23. ^World Bank Operational Manual Statement No. 2.33: Social Issues Associated with Involuntary Settlement in Bank-Financed Projects.
  24. ^Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2005). The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalisation and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. 18 Leiden Journal of International Law. pp. 345– 355.
  25. ^Armin Rosencranz, Kathleen D. Yurchak. Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India. 19 Hastings International and Company. p. 514
  26. ^Armin Rosencranz, Kathleen D. Yurchak (1996). Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India. 19 Hastings International and Company. p.371.
  27. ^Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York School of Law. p.14.
  28. ^"Legitimising Narmada Bachao Andolan". The Indian Express. Retrieved 2008-04-05. 
  29. ^Manjeet Warrior, Gajinder Singh (2008-03-28). "Aamir faces trial by torch". The Telegraph. Calcutta, India. Retrieved 2008-04-05. 
  30. ^"Taking life as it comes". The Hindu. 2014-08-23. Retrieved 2017-11-30. 
  31. ^"Narmada: A Valley Rises (1994)". Ali Kazimi. Social Doc. Retrieved July 7, 2017. 
  32. ^"A Narmada". Retrieved 2008-06-13. 
  33. ^"Nitish Kumar For Nationwide Liquor Ban". News World India. September 17, 2016. Retrieved July 7, 2017. 
  34. ^http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Indore/Narmada-Bachao-Andolan-rolls-out-political-red-carpet-for-Nitish-in-Barwani/articleshow/54379063.cms
  35. ^Miller, Susan. "Narmada dam fails World Bank's final test". New Scientist. Retrieved 2008-02-09. 
  36. ^"Judgment by the Supreme Court of India". Supreme Court of India, Justice Information System. Archived from the original on 3 March 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-05. 
  37. ^Shukla, Dinkar. "Verdict on Narmada 2000". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2008. 
  38. ^Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York School of Law. p. 34
  39. ^Kirk Leech (3 March 2009). "The Narmada dambusters are wrong". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-03-04. 
  40. ^"Internet Archive Wayback Machine". Web.archive.org. 2007-12-14. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 2012-09-14. 
  41. ^"The Telegraph — Calcutta (Kolkata) - 7days — Goddesses of all causes". 
  42. ^http://archives.digitaltoday.in/indiatoday/20060515/controvr.html
  43. ^"Narmada Bachao Andolan and AAP: A match made in rural heaven? - Firstpost". Firstpost. 2014-01-15. Retrieved 2016-10-25. 
  44. ^"Narmada Bachao Andolan faces perjury charges". The Economic Times. 

External links[edit]

Narmada Bachao Andolan logo

India’s Greatest Planned Environmental Disaster:

The Narmada Valley Dam Projects

 


 

Problem

www.sierraclub.org/human%2Drights/india/index.asp

 

“For over a century we’ve believed that Big Dams would deliver the people of India from hunger and poverty.

The opposite has happened.” -   Arundhati Roy

 

The Narmada Valley Development Project is the single largest river development scheme in India.It is one of the largest hydroelectric projects in the world and will displace approximately 1.5 million people from their land in three states (Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Madhya Pradesh).The environmental costs of such a project, which involves the construction of more than 3,000 large and small dams, are immense.The project will devastate human lives and biodiversity by inundating thousands of acres of forests and agricultural land.“The State” (India) wants to build these dams on the Narmada River in the name of National Development.But “How can you measure progress if you don’t know what it costs and who has paid for it?” (Roy 16).

Each monsoon season thousands of people are told by the Indian government that they will have to be relocated as their ancestral lands are flooded out.“The people whose lives were going to be devastated were neither informed nor consulted nor heard” (Roy 26).A disproportionate number of those being displaced are tribal people: Adivasis and Dalits.

Damming the Narmada River will degrade the fertile agricultural soils due to continuous irrigation (rather the seasonal irrigation which is dependent on the monsoon), and salinization, making the soil toxic to many plant species.The largest of the dams under construction is the Sardar Sarovar, which, if completed, will flood more than 37,000 hectares of forest and agricultural land, displacing more than half a million people and destroying some of India’s most fertile land.

 

The thing about multipurpose dams like the Sardar Sarovar is that their “purposes” (irrigation, power production, and flood control) conflict with one another.Irrigation uses up the water you need to produce power.Flood control requires you to keep the reservoir empty during the monsoon months to deal with an anticipated surfeit of water.And if there’s no surfeit, you’re left with an empty dam.And this defeats the purpose of irrigation, which is to store the monsoon water (Roy 34).

 

In the end, the Big Dam will produce only 3% of the power planners say it will – that’s only 50 megawatts!Additionally, when you take into account the power needed to pump water through the network of canals inevitably attached to the dam, the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) will consume more electricity than it produces!Another problem with the SSP is that its reservoir displaces people in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra, but its benefits go to Gujarat (Roy 34-35).Even though the arid regions of that state, Kutch and Saurashtra, are not mentioned in the water-sharing award as recipients of drinking water.

The proposed dams will affect millions of people but only a certain percentage of them will be privy to the government’s resettlement and rehabilitation (R & R) programs.The problem here arises in defining who are Project-Affected Persons (PAPs).The World Commission on Dams urges that the “impact assessment includes all people in the reservoir, upstream, downstream and in catchment areas whose properties, livelihoods and nonmaterial resources are affected.It also includes those affected by dam-related infrastructure such as canals, transmission lines and resettlement developments” (www.irn.org/wcd/narmada.shtml).In reality, however, people affected by the extensive canal system are not considered as PAPs.These people are subject to R & R packages, but not the same ones as those living in the reservoir area.Unbelievably, those not entitled to any compensation at all are the hundreds of thousands whose lands or livelihoods are affected by either project-related developments or downstream impacts.

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


Background

“Big Dams are to a nation’s ‘development’ what nuclear bombs are to its military arsenal.They’re both weapons of mass destruction.”

-  Arundhati Roy

 

The Narmada River, on which the Indian government plans to build some 3,200 dams, flows through three states: Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat.Ninety percent of the river flows through Madhya Pradesh; it skirts the northern border of Maharashtra, then flows through Gujarat for about 180 kilometers before emptying into the Arabian Sea at Bharuch.

Plans for damming the river at Gora in Gujarat surfaced as early as 1946.In fact, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation for a 49.8-meter-high dam in 1961.After studying the new maps the dam planners decided that a much larger dam would be more profitable.The only problem was hammering out an agreement with neighboring states (Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra).In 1969, after years of negotiations attempting to agree on a feasible water-sharing formula, the Indian government established the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal.Ten years later, it announced its award.“The Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award states that land should be made available to the oustees at least one year in advance before submergence” (www.narmada.org/sardarsarovar.html).

Before the Ministry of the Environment even cleared the Narmada Valley Development Projects in 1987, the World Bank sanctioned a loan for $450 million for the largest dam, the Sardar Sarovar, in 1985.In actuality,construction on the Sardar Sarovar dam site had continued sporadically since 1961, but began in earnest in 1988.Questions arose concerning the promises about resettlement and rehabilitation programs set up by the government, so by 1986 each state had a people’s organization that addressed these concerns.Soon, these groups came together to form the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), or, the Save the Narmada Movement.

In 1988, the NBA formally called for all work on the Narmada Valley Development Projects to be stopped.In September 1989, more than 50,000 people gathered in the valley from all over India to pledge to fight “destructive development.”A year later thousands of villagers walked and boated to a small town in Madhya Pradesh to reiterate their pledge to drown rather than agree to move from their homes.Under intense pressure, the World Bank was forced to create an independent review committee, the Morse Commission, which published the Morse Report (a.k.a. Independent Review) in 1992.The report “endorsed all the main concerns raised by the Andolan [NBA]” (www.narmada.org/sardarsarovar.html).In author Arundhati Roy’s opinion “It is the most balanced, unbiased, yet damning indictment of the relationship between the Indian State and the World Bank.”Two months later, the Bank sent out the Pamela Cox Committee.It suggested exactly what the Morse Report advised against: “a sort of patchwork remedy to try and salvage the operation” (Roy 45-46).Eventually, due to the international uproar created by the Report, the Bank withdrew from the Sardar Sarovar Project.In response, the Gujarati government decided to raise $200 million and push ahead with the project.

While the Independent Review was being written and also after it was published confrontations between villagers and authorities continued in the valley.After continued protests by the NBA the government charged yet another committee, the Five Member Group (FMG), to review the SSP.The FMG’s report endorsed the Morse Report’s concerns but it made no difference.Following a writ petition by the NBA in 1994 calling for a comprehensive review of the project, the Supreme Court of India stopped construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam in 1995.Tension in the area dissipated but soon the NBA’s attention shifted to two other Big Dams in Madhya Pradesh – the Narmada Sagar and the Maheshwar.Though these dams were nowhere near their projected heights their impacts on the environment and the people of the valley were already apparent.The government’s resettlement program for the displaced natives “continues to be one of callousness and broken promises” (Roy 51).In 1999, however, the Supreme Court allowed for the dam’s height to be raised to 88 meters (from 80 meters when building was halted in 1995).In October 2000, the Supreme Court issued a judgement to allow immediate construction of the Sardar Sarovar Dam to 90 meters.In addition, it allowed for the dam to be built up to its originally planned height of 138 meters.These decrees have “come from the Court despite major unresolved issues on resettlement, the environment, and the project’s costs and benefits” (www.narmada.org/sardarsarovar.html).

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


Key Actors

“Nobody builds Big Dams to provide drinking water to rural people.

Nobody can afford to.”

-  Arundhati Roy

 

Native people

Dalits are the “Untouchables” of the caste system.Translated literally the Dalits are the “oppressed” or “ground-down.”

Adivasi is the term used to designate the original inhabitants (indigenous people) of a region.

 

The State

The government of India supports the building of over 3,000 dams on the Narmada River.What the State fails to take into account are the infinite costs of what it terms National Development; the millions of lives affected by the devastating environmental impacts of building dams.

 

Narmada Bachao Andolan, The Save the Narmada Movement

The NBA is a people’s movement formed from local people’s movements in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat.Through peaceful means, the NBA has brought much media attention to the plight of the native people along the river.Medha Patkar is a prominent leader of the group.

 

World Bank

The World Bank had originally supported the Sardar Sarovar with a $450 million loan.However, after appointing an independent panel to review the impacts of the project the Bank withdrew support.The panel expressed much concern that the environmental and social impacts of the project had not been properly considered.

 

The Supreme Court

The Court is one of the most formidable opponents of the NBA.It has exercised its power over the people through judgements to continue with building of dams along the river, disregarding concerns about the dams’ environmental and social impacts.

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


Demographics

“Every aspect of the project is approached in this almost playful manner, as if it’s a family board game.

Even when it concerns the lives and futures of vast numbers of people.”- Arundhati Roy

 

In a country where 200 million people (one-fifth of the population) do not have safe drinking water, 600 million (two-thirds of the population) lack basic sanitation, and 350 million (two-fifths of the population) live below the poverty line, it is no wonder that the government of India wants to implement projects that could potentially improve the lives of the people.Unfortunately, the State chose a method that has and will likely cause more harm than good.According to the government, the Narmada Valley Dam Projects will provide water to 20 to 40 million people, irrigate 1.8 to 1.9 million hectares of land, and produce 1450 megawatts of power.The Narmada Bachao Andolan and other organizations believe otherwise.They believe these claims are greatly exaggerated.These groups estimate 1.5 million people (about 10,000 families) will be displaced in the three states of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat.

A disproportionate number of oustees are indigenous people.Eight percent of India’s population are Adivasis and fifteen percent are Dalits but an incredible sixty percent of those displaced by the dam projects are Adivasis and Dalits (Roy 18).

Back to Table of Contents

 


Strategies

“This July will bring the last monsoon of the twentieth century.The ragged army in the Narmada valley has declared that it will not move when the waters of the Sardar Sarovar reservoir rise to claim its lands and homes.” - Arundhati Roy

 

http://www.goldmanprize.org/search/search.html

 

With activist Medha Patkar to lead them, the Narmada Bachao Andolan began mobilizing massive marches and rallies against the Narmada Valley Development Project, and especially the largest, the Sardar Sarovar, in 1985.Although the protests were peaceful, Patkar and others were often beaten and arrested by police.Following the formation of the NBA in 1986, fifty thousand people gathered in the valley from all over India to pledge to fight “destructive development” in 1989. In 1990, thousands of villagers made their way by boat and foot to a small town in Madhya Pradesh in defense of their pledge to drown in the reservoir waters rather than move from their homes.Later that year on Christmas day an army of six thousand men and women accompanied a seven-member sacrificial squad in walking more than a hundred kilometers.The sacrificial squad had resolved to lay down its lives for the river.A little over a week later the squad announced an indefinite hunger strike.This was the first of three fasts and lasted twenty-two days.It almost killed Ms. Patkar, along with many others.

The NBA has also taken a more diplomatic approach to getting through to the government.They have submitted written representations (complaints) to government officials such as the Grievance Redressal Committee, the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam, the President, and the Minister of Social Justice and Environment Maneka Gandhi.More often than not, their voice goes unheard and unacknowledged.

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


Solutions

http://www.irn.org/

 

“No one has ever managed to make the World Bank step back from a project before.Least of all a ragtag army of the

poorest people in one of the world’s poorest countries.”-   Arundhati Roy

 

The demonstrations, protests, rallies, hunger strikes, blockades, and written representations by Narmada Bachao Andolan have all made an impact on the direction of the movement to stop the building of large and small dams along the Narmada.Media attention from these events has taken the issues from a local level to a more national scale.The NBA was an integral force in forcing the World Bank to withdraw its loan from the projects by pressuring the Bank with negative media attention.

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


Recommendations

“Big Dams are obsolete…They lay the earth to waste.They cause floods, waterlogging, salinity; they spread disease.

There is mounting evidence that links Big Dams to earthquakes.”-   Arundhati Roy

 

Reassessing the environmental and social impacts of the more than 3,000 dams slated for construction should be the first step the Indian government takes in solving the country’s water management problems.It should then observe the recommendations proposed by those assessments, rather than ignoring them.

The country and the individual states could also consider cheaper and more effective energy options that do in fact already exist.In fact, “A task force set up by the Madhya Pradesh state government suggested alternatives such as demand management measures, biomass generation, optimum use of oil-based plants and existing dams, and micro-hydro plants” (www.irn.org/wcd/narmada.shtml).

According to renowned irrigation expert K. R. Datye, a comprehensive review of the yield of the land, taking into account the water, energy, and biomass availability is required.Datye highlights the need for regenerative water use for agriculture, using local water resources.Water from outside (i.e. dams) is used to restore vegetative cover to degraded land and to recharge ground water aquifers that are badly depleted, to a point where water and energy balance can be maintained (www.narmada.org/sardar-sarovar/ecotimes.alternatives.html).

The following watershed management strategies are traditional practices that have been revived by local communities in the states of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat with the help of Non-Governmental Organizations and state government programs.

 

Alwar District, Rajasthan

Revival of old and building of new water harvesting structures coupled with formation of gram sabhas for equitable water distribution has transformed the people of the semi-arid, drought prone district.

Awarded the "DOWN TO EARTH-JOSEPH C JOHN AWARD" for India's most outstanding environmental community.

BanniGrasslands

Kutch Dist., Gujarat

A complex rainwater harvesting system developed over centuries by the Maldharis of Banni grasslands is threatened by natural factors and man made interventions.

Jhabua District, Madhya Pradesh

MP state government's emphasis on participatory management, trans-parency and decentralization in implementing watershed development programs sets an example that could be replicated all over India.

Thunthi Kankasiya & Mahudi, Dahod Dist.

Surendranagar District

Devgadh, Junagadh District

Villages in Gujarat that have taken watershed management measures have enough water for drinking and even irrigation in the middle of the most severe drought of this century.

http://www.narmada.org/ALTERNATIVES/index.html

 

Alternatives to dams do exist and should be considered seriously.

 

Back to Table of Contents

 


References

“India: Peaceful Demonstrators Against the Narmada Dam Project Arrested, Beaten, and Intimidated by Police.”The Sierra Club: Human Rights Campaigns.1999.

<http://www.sierraclub.org/human%2Drights/india/index.asp>

 

“Medha Patkar.”The Goldman Environmental Prize.1992.

<http://www.goldmanprize.org/search/search.html>

 

Narmada River page.International Rivers Network.1996-2000.

<http://irn.org/programs/narmada/map.html>

 

Roy, Arundhati.The Cost of Living.New York: Random House, Inc.1999.

 

“The Sardar Sarovar: A Brief Introduction.”Friends of the River Narmada.2000.

<http://narmada.org/sardarsarovar.html>

 

Shruti Mukthyar.“Alternatives.”Friends of the River Narmada.U of Wisconsin-Madison: Institute for Environmental Studies.2000.

<http://narmada.org/ALTERNATIVES/index.html>

 

Back to Table of Contents


0 thoughts on “Narmada Valley Project Case Study

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *